Sunday, July 20, 2014

Drug Sentencing: Does the Punishment Fit the Crime?

By: Jordan Rande
Sunday, July 20, 2014

Source: Chicagocriminallawyer.com

In the past 30 years since the “war on drugs” began and the harsh sentencing imposed on non-violent drug offenders was enacted, the prison population has exploded.  The rate of drug abuse and addiction has not improved despite the continued effort to make the problem go away by arresting and imprisoning as many drug users as our prisons can hold.    

Recent data from the U.S. Department of Justice indicates that more than half of the prison population is serving time for drug related offenses. Taxpayers spend billions of dollars a year on prison systems that are overcrowded and serve as a breeding ground for thugs and gangs. Many people that enter the prison system become more harmful to society than before they entered. The CRC Health Group, a drug treatment center, wrote that “statistics reveal many addictions usually grow in prison. With no treatment available and drugs easily obtained, how can we expect our prison population to achieve or maintain sobriety?”[1]

Society can no longer pretend that overcrowded prisons that lack rehabilitation services are the answer to nonviolent drug offenses.  It is time to admit that drug use cannot be controlled by punishment. Most drug crimes are committed by addicts, which are people who are self-medicating for depression or suffering from a mental illness. Others are just unlucky people making the wrong choice, in the wrong place, and at the wrong time.

I don’t support the use of illegal drugs, but it seems ridiculous to put someone in prison for selling a few pain pills to a friend or be sentenced to life in prison for non-violent marijuana offenses. Prisons should return to their primary role of incarcerating violent criminals who commit murder, robbery, rape, assault, and child molestation

I believe treatment, rehabilitation and probation services are the key to dealing with non-violent drug offenses. The State of Texas has been successfully following this philosophy since 2007 when they rejected a proposal to build eight prisons, but instead shifted non-violent drug offenders into alternative treatment programs. Since then, the State of Texas has saved nearly $2 billion dollars and the incarceration rate has dropped by nearly 20%.[2]

A recent poll conducted by Pew Research Center reports that the attitudes of Americans towards drug related crimes may be shifting towards this philosophy as well.  Two thirds of Americans polled would like to see illegal drug offenders enter programs that focus on treatment and rehabilitation rather than incarceration.[3] 

As part of this evolving change in public opinion, the U.S. Sentencing Commission voted in April of this year to lower the federal drug sentencing guidelines. This will go into effect on November 1st as long as Congress doesn’t take action to stop this amendment.  On Friday, July 18th the Commission voted to retroactively apply this amendment in order to shorten sentences for tens of thousands of people who are currently serving prison time for drug offenses. This will eventually lead to a broader effort to adapt the federal policy to change laws and put an end to marijuana prohibition and consequences of a drug conviction at the state level. Now this is change I can believe in!

The Ways of Bugging: Are You In or Out?

By: Bear Claw
Sunday, July 20, 2014

Source: Bugoutbagmethod.com

In our last article we talked about how you need a plan. Now we will go over the two main kinds of plans that exist: bugging in and bugging out. Bugging in, in its most basic sense, is to hunker down or hold position normally in your primary dwelling, but it can mean other place. Bugging out means to get out or leave your current location and head to a new one. The term “bugging”, as it was explained to me by an old Vietnam veteran, comes mainly from the military vocabulary that refers to what the bugs do after being exposed from under a rock or a log, and scatter in every direction, eventually returning when it’s safe (i.e. you leave).”

Bugging in

Like I mentioned above, when you bug in, you are digging in to try to ride out the emergency, or because you have been prevented from bugging out; situations such as bad weather (snow, tornado, hurricane etc), government quarantine, and waiting for bug out party to assemble can delay or even prevent a bug out. Some pros of bugging in are as follows:

  • Familiarity of surroundings/intimate knowledge of lay of the land
  • Less stressful on children and the elderly
  • Since most folks’ bug in area is their home, they have more time to prepare and conceal their supplies
  • Little or no time exposed on the road

Some cons of bugging in are

  • Local people in the area may know you have supplies
o   I’m not saying your neighbors are bad people, but when times get hard people will get desperate 

  •  Local authorities may know you have supplies, and if they deem it necessary to take your “excess” supplies and redistribute to the less prepared they are legally allowed to do so under the NDRP (National Defense Resource Preparedness)[1].
  • It may put you in harm’s way if the disaster is, or becomes worse than reports indicate
  • If you’re stuck inside for extended periods it, can become stressful
o   AKA: “cabin fever”

There are probably more pros and cons, but these are the ones that stick out to me. Some considerations for bugging in are as follows:

  • Supplies: depending on your exact budget and amount of storage space it would be a good idea to have enough supplies to last a few weeks to 6 months.
  • Defense: do you have enough weapons and training to defend your home? Are there things you can do to make your home more defensible IE: nailing plywood over part of the windows so you can see out but it’s harder to see in, barricading the door so it’s hard to break in but easy to get out if you have to.
  • Pets: people often forget about our furred and feathered companions in an emergency but you should be making arrangements for them as well in an emergency.
  • Supplies: do you have enough supplies and in case your supplies run out or are stolen do you have a backup or a resupply plan)?

Bugging out 

When talking about bugging out, you need to know that there are two main kinds. The first is where you are going planned beforehand that is well stocked and provisioned to last for a long time. The second is where you grab your “72 hour bag”, or “bug out bag” (BOB), and head for the hills without a concrete plan or direction. This is not an ideal situation and should only be done if no other option is left.  Most people do not have the training, much less the sand to tough it out in the woods with only the contents of their BOB, nevertheless, I will cover this in a future article as it’s always better to have something and not need it, than to need it and not have it For now, try to avoid using the second option at all costs. The purpose of this article is to introduce the idea and expand on the first bug out plan.

Some of the pros of bugging out to your predetermined or “bug out location (BOL are:

  • Can get away from major population centers
  • Less likely locals will know of your supplies
  • Can have a structure specifically built for  emergency situations
  • Possible areas to hunt, farm, or garden to supplement your supplies
  • Some of the cons of bugging out are:
  • Valuable time could be lost waiting for your group to assemble
  • “Bug out vehicle” may break down between your home and BOL, leaving you stranded and forced to go the rest of the way on foot and arriving with only the supplies you could carry
  • Risk of getting injured and far from reliable medical care to be helped.
  • Not as familiar with the new location
  • If the BOL isn’t manned (IE somebody lives in the BOL), you could get there and find someone else has already occupied it or ransacked it for your supplies.
Again, the list of pros and cons could go on, but these should be enough to get you thinking. A few considerations for bug outs are:

  • Where are you going? Is it a prearranged gathering place for you and others at your brothers’ house in the mountains? Or is it just for your family and close friends at a location you have spent a long time constructing?
  • Who is going? Sure, your second cousin Steve is great for a few laughs at the family reunions, but he’s also known to be a drunk and a thief who generally just gets into trouble. He may be family, but taking him could be dangerous to the rest of your group. These decisions will be hard to make in the moment, so make them early.
  • When are you going? If you run too early, not only will you waste supplies and this will quickly become trying for your family, friends, and employer. On the other side of the coin, if you wait for the government to tell you when to bug out then you will most likely get caught in the mass exodus when everybody goes at once. The best example of this is the recent snow storms (i.e. Snowpocalypse) right here in Georgia where a lot of people got stuck on the interstate in the snow for days.
  • What are you going in? Is your bug out vehicle reliable? Is it powerful enough to take to carry everyone and all your supplies a very long way if needed? Are you taking more than one vehicle? If so, cross-load your supplies in case one vehicle is lost in route. This way, you won’t lose all of your supplies.
  • Opsec or operational security; how secure is the info on your location does anyone know what you have there? Does anyone know where you’re going? The fewer outsiders that know of your plans and provisions, the less chance you have of unwelcome guests.

Source:
Now that you have some more stuff to stick under your thinking cap, I’ll leave you alone to think about it. Comeback next week and join us for more articles, and if you have any requests or suggestions, let me hear them (email: ratatoskrtheredmessenger@gmail.com) and I’ll see what I can do for you. As always, watch your top knot and keep your eyes along the skyline.

Signed,
Bear Claw

“You head due west or any other directions tomorrow and you’ll be a starving pilgrim within a week. You aren’t likely to meet up with someone of my good nature” --Jeremiah Johnson, 1972 

The Rise of Police Brutality in the U.S.


Source: Sodahead.com
By: Jessica Swords
Sunday, July 20, 2014

In the wake of a tragedy in New York where five police officers took down Eric Garner, a citizen who was surrounded by police after breaking up a fight, it leaves citizens from all states wondering what is going on with the increase in excessive force by law enforcement officers.

If you would like to read more on the story regarding the death of Eric Garner and to see the video, please visit the following link: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/staten-island-da-man-death-nypd-chokehold-article-1.1871946

Looking into crimes committed by law enforcement, most complaints or reports that are filed against officers are violent crimes, while financial crimes are the least, yet most charged and convicted.*

Source: The CATO Inst.'s Police Misconduct Reporting Project


Most reported violent crimes committed by police officers occur while they are on duty. David Packman’s report on police misconduct shows that “on-duty violence is only prosecuted 9.6% of the time while off-duty violence is prosecuted 66.7% of the time”. Out of the violent crime rates, over 90% are head of law enforcement (sheriffs and chiefs).*

Source: The CATO Inst.'s Police Misconduct Reporting Project


According to Packman’s report, the reported financial charges have the most success in convictions, while drug related crimes has the least. His explanation is as follows:

“The reason for difficulties in the drugs/alcohol category appears to be with DUI type cases as police officers tend to be very proficient on how best to defend against that type of case. Law enforcement officers tend to refuse to take BAC tests and, as in the news recently, officers tend to be unwilling to charge fellow officers in traffic stop situations due to the stigmas attached to “ratting out” fellow offices.”*

Source: The CATO Inst.'s Police Misconduct Reporting Project

So while implied consent laws require citizens to give chemical testing on command, regardless of its unconstitutionality, officers seem to be above the law. While almost 70% of the general population get convicted after being charged with a crime, while only a mere 30% of law enforcement get the same treatment. The incarceration rate, or the rate for those who get jail time, is also 10% higher among civilians than officers. Out of those become incarcerated, civilians are more than three times likely to serve the average sentence or higher.*

It is the responsibility of every citizen to speak out when they see misconduct by police, and do not tolerate favoritism of law “enforcement” officers over civilians. If the law applies to one, it applies to all. Period.



*David Packman, What Can We Learn from Criminal Cases Against Cops: http://www.policemisconduct.net/what-can-criminal-charges-against-cops-tell-us/